One of the most dramatic developments in science in the last decade is the study of our Universe. This is due to the very sophisticated observations with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) since 1990. The Universe shows new features that could not have been foreseen or predicted before. Also, the measured cosmological parameters are accurate enough to permit comparison with theory. Thus, for example, the Universe is expanding with acceleration rather than slowing down due to gravity as had previously been believed. The reason for this acceleration is believed to be due to (vacuum) dark energy which constitutes about two thirds (72%) of the total energy of the Universe. The other one third of the Universes energy is due to seen baryonic matter (4%) and unseen (dark) matter (22%). The Carmeli model predicted the acceleration 2 years before the discovery and has yields a universe without dark matter or dark energy. The new theory is consistent with the locally measured 4% baryonic matter. The new cosmology is constructed as an analogue to Einsteins Special Relativity, by exchanging c → τ and t v. This result in spacevelocity in 4D or spacetimevelocity in 5D.

 

 

Carmeli Cosmology: The universe can be explained without Dark Matter

 

 

(click on highlighted text for paper)

 

The accelerating expansion of the cosmos was predicted by Carmeli [1] two years before the publication in 1998 [2] established the fact. This paper shows that by using the phase-space equation from the Carmeli cosmology there is no need to assume the existence of any dark matter to explain the accelerating universe.  This paper applies the theory to the data of the high redshift type Ia supernova teams and this one introduces the correct form of the luminosity distance and applies a corrected density model. No dark matter is needed and no dark energy either. The correct metric (physics) incorporates what we call ‘vacuum energy’ but it is not explicit in the metric. This paper extends the range of the cosmology to extremely high redshifts and uses GRBs as a test to about z = 7. It also provides an explanation why we live in a Universe that is spatially flat—Euclidean! See press release.

 

Carmeli showed in 1998 that from his new cosmological metric a Tully-Fisher type relation could be derived. The theory has now been applied to actual spiral galaxy rotation curves and it was discovered that their must exist two acceleration regimes. This is similar to the idea in MOND[3-5]. In this theory if the acceleration is greater than some critical value the Newtonian force law applies, but below this value a Carmelian regime is operative. It was also found the theory works for spheroidal and elliptical galaxies.

 

The Carmeli model describes a spherically symmetric isotropic but not necessarily homogeneous universe. It has been also shown that the data of the high redshift type Ia supernova teams is consistent with a universe that is a finite bounded expanding white hole with the Galaxy at the center.

 

A new paper looks at the properties of gravitational waves in Carmeli’s Cosmological General Relativity and found that where the density between galaxies is less than the critical value (about 10-29 g/cm3) gravity waves won’t propagate. Instead they are evanescent and we conjecture are absorbed into the vacuum as heat.

 

Recommended books are Cosmological Special Relativity 2nd Ed. 2002 and Cosmological Relativity 2006.

 

References

 

 

[1]        M. Carmeli, "Cosmological General Relativity," Commun. Theor. Phys., vol. 5, pp. 159, 1996.

[2]        A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, and A. Diercks, "Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant," Astron. J., vol. 116, pp. 1009-1038, 1998.

[3]        M. Milgrom, "A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis," Ap J, vol. 270, pp. 365-370, 1983.

[4]        M. Milgrom, "A modification of the Newtonian dynamics - Implications for galaxies," Ap J, vol. 270, pp. 371-383, 1983.

[5]        M. Milgrom, "A Modification of the Newtonian Dynamics - Implications for Galaxy Systems," Ap J, vol. 270, pp. 384-389, 1983.