|
2008 Semester 1 |
2nd year Data Analysis |
|
http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~hammond/DataAnalysis/
Recommended text: PR Bevington, “Data Reduction and Error
Analysis for the Physical Sciences”
though any text book on data analysis will
likely have many components of what will be covered in lectures.
|
|
|
Q1 ex 11 Q2 ex 8 Q3 ex 12 |
|
Student query and PH response (9/04/08) |
I was wondering if you could please answer a couple of
questions that I have about data analysis. I have written up an example (modified
from Levy & Preidel’s question 3) that outlines methods appropriate to
your questions below. Firstly, when doing the method of weighted least squares, how do you determine sigma(i)? Estimate, perhaps by using an unweighted
fit to get an idea of the sigma value. Secondly, I'm not quite sure how to use the propagation of uncertainties formula for sigma(z) This is outlined in lecture 4 and in the
example here. Lastly, what process are we supposed to use to determine
whether we need to use the weighted least squares method or not? I hope the example here will help with
making these kind of decisions. |
|
|
Tutorial |
Explicit expressions for a
& b in a weighted least squares Two analysed examples with calculation layouts from Bevington Handwritten comments from overhead
projector |
|
|
Lecture 4
|
Assessment
Project Make a full analysis of exercises 1, 4 and 5 from Levy & Preidel (1944) (pdf) commenting explicitly on which exercises require the use of weighted least squares and which do not. All figures showing graphs of the data should be of the form which includes a plot of residuals as outlined in lectures. Each student should work
alone, developing their own data analysis routine. The answer to each exercise should be
written up in the form of the data analysis section of a laboratory report
and the analysis method and discussion of the results should be in normal
written English. It MUST NOT be the
raw print out of a Mathematica or Excel spreadsheet (or other software
pachage). Hand-in deadline
(Physics Office) – Friday 11 April 10am (very strict
deadline) |
|
|
Lecture 3
|
3(a) Assume your data from lecture 1 follows s(i) = a + b i. Determine values for a ± σa and b ± σb . In the light of these values review your responses to 2(b), 2(c) and 2(d). 3(b) Answer the 9 questions from "Elementary Statistics" by Levy & Preidel (1944) (pdf) (some of which will need transforming into z(k) = a + b k form – be careful about your use of nomenclature in these cases) and determine values for a ± σa and b ± σb. |
Do they agree with yours? The book results have not been checked and may not be reliable!! |
|
Lecture 2
ERS data – using ±3σ distributions |
2(a) Complete the set-work for Lecture 1 (i.e. calculate s and σS for your 50 point sample of the dataset) 2(b) Plot your 50 point dataset on a graph.
2(c) Is the analysis result proposed by the 1000 data point student consistent with your values for s and σS when taking into account his results arising from a 1000 point dataset (of which yours was a 50 point sample) and your identified trend(s) from (b)? 2(d) Calculate the standard deviation σD of your 50 point dataset (you may have already done this!!).
Bring hardcopy of your worked solution to lecture 3. Be prepared to discuss your solution.
|
|
|
Lecture 1 |
Do this question before the next lecture. Each student should bring their calculated value of s and σS to fill in on an overhead before the lecture. In your analysis DO NOT use built in functions (e.g. of a calculator, spreadsheet or Mathematica) to perform the statistical analysis – write your own functions based on the formula presented in lectures. Each of you has a different sample of the complete dataset for the situation below. The data files are available from the link in the next column – use the file next to your name. A student makes length measurements of 1000 rods produced in an industrial process. The results are written down as the length difference s of each rod from the expected length. The student then analysed the dataset and reported the overall difference as: s = 0.65 ± 0.25 mm. Is the average result reported by the student reasonable? Justify your opinion with your statistical analysis of your sample of 50 data points from his dataset. |